| 
				Chapter X Part II
 The United States 
				of Europe: Preliminary thoughts
 The idea of the organized State and the 
				theory of Socialism which germinated in Germany began to 
				influence other European countries, even England, ’the home of 
				individualism’ (The Ideal of Human Unity, pg 347). The defeat of 
				Germany did not mean a defeat of her socialistic idea, on the 
				contrary, emboldened it. The evident result of the World War I 
				was that even nations opposed to Germany were forced to move 
				rapidly to the perfectly organized socialistic State (Ibid, pg 
				347-348). Sri Aurobindo opined that as a corollary, a federation 
				of free nations would logically evolve: ‘…the natural 
				development of things aided by the frustration of the German 
				form of imperialism would lead logically to a new ordering of 
				the world on the basis of a system of independent but 
				increasingly organized national States associated together more 
				or less closely for international purposes while preserving 
				their independent existence. Such is the ideal which has 
				attracted the human mind as a yet distant possibility since the 
				great revolutionary ferment set in; it is the idea of a 
				federation of free nations, the parliament of man, the 
				federation of the world’(Ibid, pg 348). Sri Aurobindo was simultaneously aware that 
				this dream was not immediately feasible in the aftermath of 
				World War I. He explained that the nationalistic, democratic and 
				socialist ideas were not alone in the political psyche; 
				imperialism was equally and forcefully present. There were 
				European countries that cherished their free nationhood and 
				eulogized democratic ideals and yet had no inhibitions in 
				dominating other human groupings who were not free or partially 
				free colonies.  Even small European countries had big colonies: 
				Belgium had Congo, Portugal had faraway colonies, Holland had 
				dependencies in the Eastern Archipelago; little Balkan States 
				had imperialistic ambitions while Mazzini’s Italy had ventures 
				in Tripoli, Abyssinia, Albania and the Greek islands. Sri 
				Aurobindo forewarned in 1916: ‘This imperialistic tendency is 
				likely to grow stronger for some time in the future rather than 
				to weaken. The idea of remodeling even of Europe itself on the 
				strict principle of nationality, which captivated liberal minds 
				in England at the beginning of the war, has not yet been made 
				practicable and, if it were effected, there would still remain 
				the whole of Asia and Africa as a field for the imperialistic 
				ambitions of the Western nations and Japan’ (Ibid).  Despite the continuation of imperialism, it 
				was also interesting that the United States had decreed ‘the 
				liberation of the Philippines and restrained the desire to take 
				advantage of the troubles of Mexico’ (Ibid). Sri Aurobindo 
				explains that the disinterestedness of USA to maintain colonies 
				was because it represented a fresh energetic mind-set in 
				contrast to ‘the mentality of the Old World’ though he doubted 
				how long the USA would remain free of the ‘imperialistic 
				sentiment’.  We know today that the imperialistic sentiment can 
				still prevail in a decolonized world in new garbs. He also 
				opined that there could be a resurgence of ‘national egoism’ 
				even if restrained by higher motives and a better national 
				morality, retarding the process of world-unity. How true! One is 
				reminded how Yugoslavia,  a socialist and secular multi-ethnic 
				State, just ceased to exist when the national ego of each ethnic 
				group began to be assertive turning neighbors into arch enemies. Human Unity cannot be imposed from above by 
				a theoretically sound idea; it has to evolve from below winding 
				its perilous way through the vagaries of collective life. 
				Nationalism cannot just be blotted out to pave in 
				internationalism, its quality and direction has to be changed so 
				as to provide conducive conditions for global unity. A 
				federation of free nations would be one such step forward to 
				international unity and in the post World War I scenario; Europe 
				offered a perfect field for such an experiment. However there 
				were three impediments to that vision: 
				(a)   Inequality between nations; 
				(b)  
				Absence of a global culture; and 
				(c)  In the co-existence of the imperialistic instinct with 
				the principle of nationalism, the former tended to dominate. Yet the Time-Spirit demanded 
				a larger vision towards global unity that surpassed imperialism. 
				Hence Sri Aurobindo commented in the aftermath of World War I, 
				‘All that can be hoped is that the old artificial, merely 
				political empire may be replaced by a truer and more moral type, 
				and that the existing empires, driven by the necessity of 
				strengthening themselves and by an enlightened self-interest, 
				may come to see that the recognition of national autonomy is a 
				wise and necessary concession to the still vital instinct of 
				nationalism and can be used so as to strengthen instead of 
				weakening their imperial strength and unity. In this way, 
				while a federation of free nations is for the present 
				impossible, a system of federated empires and free nations drawn 
				together in a closer association than the world has yet seen is 
				not altogether impossible; and through this and other steps some 
				form of political unity for mankind  may at a more or less 
				distant date be realisable’(Ibid, pg 349-350).  In a footnote added after World War II, Sri 
				Aurobindo had commented, ’The appearance of Hitler and the 
				colossal attempt at German world-domination have paradoxically 
				helped by his defeat, and the reaction against him entirely 
				altered the world circumstances: the United States of Europe is 
				now a practical possibility and has begun to feel towards self-accomplishment’(ibid).  
				It took nearly five decades for the European Union to evolve 
				through the Maastricht Treaty in 1993. Date of Update: 
				19-Jun-12 - By Dr. Soumitra Basu   |