Chapter X Part II
The United States
of Europe: Preliminary thoughts
The idea of the organized State and the
theory of Socialism which germinated in Germany began to
influence other European countries, even England, ’the home of
individualism’ (The Ideal of Human Unity, pg 347). The defeat of
Germany did not mean a defeat of her socialistic idea, on the
contrary, emboldened it. The evident result of the World War I
was that even nations opposed to Germany were forced to move
rapidly to the perfectly organized socialistic State (Ibid, pg
347-348). Sri Aurobindo opined that as a corollary, a federation
of free nations would logically evolve: ‘…the natural
development of things aided by the frustration of the German
form of imperialism would lead logically to a new ordering of
the world on the basis of a system of independent but
increasingly organized national States associated together more
or less closely for international purposes while preserving
their independent existence. Such is the ideal which has
attracted the human mind as a yet distant possibility since the
great revolutionary ferment set in; it is the idea of a
federation of free nations, the parliament of man, the
federation of the world’(Ibid, pg 348).
Sri Aurobindo was simultaneously aware that
this dream was not immediately feasible in the aftermath of
World War I. He explained that the nationalistic, democratic and
socialist ideas were not alone in the political psyche;
imperialism was equally and forcefully present. There were
European countries that cherished their free nationhood and
eulogized democratic ideals and yet had no inhibitions in
dominating other human groupings who were not free or partially
free colonies. Even small European countries had big colonies:
Belgium had Congo, Portugal had faraway colonies, Holland had
dependencies in the Eastern Archipelago; little Balkan States
had imperialistic ambitions while Mazzini’s Italy had ventures
in Tripoli, Abyssinia, Albania and the Greek islands. Sri
Aurobindo forewarned in 1916: ‘This imperialistic tendency is
likely to grow stronger for some time in the future rather than
to weaken. The idea of remodeling even of Europe itself on the
strict principle of nationality, which captivated liberal minds
in England at the beginning of the war, has not yet been made
practicable and, if it were effected, there would still remain
the whole of Asia and Africa as a field for the imperialistic
ambitions of the Western nations and Japan’ (Ibid).
Despite the continuation of imperialism, it
was also interesting that the United States had decreed ‘the
liberation of the Philippines and restrained the desire to take
advantage of the troubles of Mexico’ (Ibid). Sri Aurobindo
explains that the disinterestedness of USA to maintain colonies
was because it represented a fresh energetic mind-set in
contrast to ‘the mentality of the Old World’ though he doubted
how long the USA would remain free of the ‘imperialistic
sentiment’. We know today that the imperialistic sentiment can
still prevail in a decolonized world in new garbs. He also
opined that there could be a resurgence of ‘national egoism’
even if restrained by higher motives and a better national
morality, retarding the process of world-unity. How true! One is
reminded how Yugoslavia, a socialist and secular multi-ethnic
State, just ceased to exist when the national ego of each ethnic
group began to be assertive turning neighbors into arch enemies.
Human Unity cannot be imposed from above by
a theoretically sound idea; it has to evolve from below winding
its perilous way through the vagaries of collective life.
Nationalism cannot just be blotted out to pave in
internationalism, its quality and direction has to be changed so
as to provide conducive conditions for global unity. A
federation of free nations would be one such step forward to
international unity and in the post World War I scenario; Europe
offered a perfect field for such an experiment. However there
were three impediments to that vision:
(a) Inequality between nations;
(b)
Absence of a global culture; and
(c) In the co-existence of the imperialistic instinct with
the principle of nationalism, the former tended to dominate.
Yet the Time-Spirit demanded
a larger vision towards global unity that surpassed imperialism.
Hence Sri Aurobindo commented in the aftermath of World War I,
‘All that can be hoped is that the old artificial, merely
political empire may be replaced by a truer and more moral type,
and that the existing empires, driven by the necessity of
strengthening themselves and by an enlightened self-interest,
may come to see that the recognition of national autonomy is a
wise and necessary concession to the still vital instinct of
nationalism and can be used so as to strengthen instead of
weakening their imperial strength and unity. In this way,
while a federation of free nations is for the present
impossible, a system of federated empires and free nations drawn
together in a closer association than the world has yet seen is
not altogether impossible; and through this and other steps some
form of political unity for mankind may at a more or less
distant date be realisable’(Ibid, pg 349-350).
In a footnote added after World War II, Sri
Aurobindo had commented, ’The appearance of Hitler and the
colossal attempt at German world-domination have paradoxically
helped by his defeat, and the reaction against him entirely
altered the world circumstances: the United States of Europe is
now a practical possibility and has begun to feel towards self-accomplishment’(ibid).
It took nearly five decades for the European Union to evolve
through the Maastricht Treaty in 1993.
Date of Update:
19-Jun-12 - By Dr. Soumitra Basu
|