Chapter X Part III
The United States of Europe: Concept-Formation
In the aftermath of World War I, Sri
Aurobindo conceptualized how the formation of a United States of
Europe could logically evolve as a historical necessity. One way
that was already being suggested ‘was the elimination of war by
a stricter international law administered by an international
Court and supported by the sanction of the nations which shall
be enforced by all of them against any offender’ (The Ideal of
human Unity, pg 350).It would however be difficult to enforce
the law delivered by such a Court as an unholy alliance of rival
groupings could sabotage justice and unity. It is in this
background of the ‘Concert of Europe’ that Sri Aurobindo
pointed out , ‘ The Law within a nation is only secure because
there is a recognized authority empowered to determine it and to
make the necessary changes and possessed of a sufficient force
to punish all violation of its statutes. An international or an
inter-European law must have the same advantages if it is to
exercise anything more than a merely moral force which can be
set at naught by those who are strong enough to defy it and who
find an advantage in the violation. Some form of European
federation, however loose, is therefore essential if the idea
behind these suggestions of a new order is to be made
practically effective, and once commenced, such a federation
must necessarily be tightened and draw more and more towards the
form of a United States of Europe’(Ibid, pg 350-351).
True to Sri Aurobindo’s anticipation, the
European Union formalized through the Maastricht Treaty in 1993,
signaled an era of peace and abolition of war among
member-States who were arch-enemies for centuries (like Germany
and France, France and England) and the European Court of
Justice, one of the principal organs of the European Union has
gained credibility. In fact, though the European Union was
primarily meant to oversee the economic and political
integration of member-States, the law-based integrative
perspective has perhaps till date held more resilience than the
economic and political perspectives as events in 2012 started
exposing financial chinks in the Euro-armour.
It would be interesting to recall some of
Sri Aurobindo’s apprehensions about the envisaged European unity
which he voiced in 1916:
-
The European unity would have to be ‘maintained and
perfected against the many forces of dissolution, the many
causes of quarrel which would for long try it to the
breaking point’ (Ibid, pg 351). Indeed, the economic crisis
in Greece brought it close to a near breaking from eurozone
in May, 2012 and the temporary crisis management has only
emboldened the idea that in the absence of a real political
unity, the credit rating agencies will call the shots. As
Europeans discover that the bond markets have more power
over their destinies than they have themselves, the conflict
between democracy and capitalism gets fresh leverage. David
Marqand, an ex-official in the European Commission (Deccan
Chronicle, 12th July,2012, published by
arrangement with New York Times) succinctly explains that
this conflict can take a toll in the democratization of
Europe as recent elections are marked by a steady fall in
voter turn-outs with the far-Right and far-Left gaining
significantly. It would be a tragedy if the democratization
of Europe was affected as the European Union was established
after settling of age-old disputes between arch-enemies like
Germany and France, abolition of Fascist regimes that once
ruled Spain, Italy and Portugal and abolition of Soviet
puppet regimes that had once an important sway over Europe.
-
Sri Aurobindo also foresaw that a strong European
unity would ‘inevitably awaken in antagonism to it an idea
of Asiatic unity and an idea of American unity, and while
such continental groupings replacing the present smaller
national unities might well be an advance towards the final
union of all mankind, yet their realisation would mean
cataclysms of a kind and scope …in which the hopes of
mankind might founder and fatally collapse rather than
progress nearer to fulfilment’ (Ibid). It would be
significant to read the chain of events that followed this
statement written in 1916. Firstly, third world countries
shed off their colonial past to form significant regional
supra-national groupings viz. ASEAN in Asia, UNASUL in Latin
America, African Union and ECOWAS in sub-Saharan Africa.
Such regional groupings are expected to facilitate best
practices in economic co-operation and political unity at
regional levels which can later be elevated to a global
level when a consensus on best practices emerges. Secondly,
supra-national groupings can effectively try to dominate
other human groupings as in the case of OPEC (Organization
of Petroleum Exporting Countries) which increased oil prices
in retaliation of Western preference of Israel resulting in
a huge increase in income during the 1973 Arab-Israeli War.
Thirdly, the creation of a single European currency, the
euro, was the most important development in the
International monetary system in recent times to become a
real competitor of the dollar which had long surpassed the
pound sterling. In fact, the euro has given eurozone an
increased autonomy in monetary affairs in the context of a
market economy dominated by the USA. That despite problems,
the dollar continues to dominate the euro needs an
appreciation of non-financial factors like national security
concerns. Fourthly, with the growing importance of regional
supra-national groupings, the financial world cannot be
maintained in a strictly bipolar fashion between the dollar
and the euro; China has already expressed its agenda to
enter this arena by promoting her currency. Fifthly, it has
also been speculated that the world can move to a leaderless
currency system one day with different currencies competing
for international use and recognition, the competition
dictated by counter-productive political rivalries instead
of a globally unifying vision.
Despite these
concerns, European unity emerging from that part of the
globe which gave to mankind the principles of liberty and
equality as well as the clarion call to unite all working
comrades and elevate the status of the proletariat is a
historically significant step and forerunner towards
international unity.
Date of Update:
19-Jul-12 - By Dr. Soumitra Basu
|